A woman who claims to have been a former event organizer for Diddy has recently made shocking allegations. According to her, Diddy hosted extravagant parties, known as “Freak Off,” in 2004 and 2005, with strict standards for female guests. In an exclusive interview with the New York Post, the event planner, who asked to remain anonymous, revealed details about the controversial selection process and the rigorous appearance standards required for the women who attended these events.
Here's ads banner inside a post
“We would weigh the girls if necessary,” she shared. “They had to be young and attractive, so I always had a scale nearby to make sure. The weight limit was set at 140 pounds, but if a girl was particularly tall, there was a bit of flexibility.” She also added other criteria: “No flab, no cellulite, no excessive piercings or tattoos. No short hair. And all the girls had to be young and hot.”
Strict Dress Code for Female Guests
In addition to physical standards, she noted that the dress code was also strictly enforced. “No pants. No jeans. No flat shoes. Every girl had to wear a party dress, preferably very short—just enough to cover her buttocks but not past mid-thigh. The dress needed to show cleavage, and every single girl had to wear high stilettos, without exception.”
Another detail she revealed was that the ages of the girls were never asked. “It was ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ when it came to their age. At the time, I was also quite young and honestly thought that the reason we weren’t asking was to avoid any issues with drinking laws,” she said. “I never stayed for the full ‘Freak Off’ events and had no idea these girls might be expected to do things beyond what they signed up for.”
Here's ads banner inside a post
The Nature of “Freak Off” Parties and Suspicions about Hidden Motives
These allegations have raised many questions about the true nature of Diddy’s parties and their intentions. The stringent selection process for female guests wasn’t just limited to appearance but also involved requirements around age, clothing, and behavior. Such strict criteria have shocked the public and led to doubts about the level of control and the underlying motives behind these events. The “Freak Off” parties weren’t merely social gatherings but reportedly involved discriminatory standards based on appearance and other personal factors.
Although the event organizer did not directly accuse Diddy of forcing guests into sexual activities, her descriptions of the parties have raised many questions. She claims that Diddy never asked the ages of the girls, leading her to believe that the only reason was to avoid legal issues related to alcohol. However, this “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach has led some to suspect that certain guests may not have reached the legal age but were still welcomed into an environment full of temptations and social pressures.
Diddy’s Response and Recent Legal Issues
Throughout his career, Diddy has faced numerous serious accusations. However, these allegations regarding behavior at his “Freak Off” parties are said to have put the rapper in an incredibly challenging position. Currently, Diddy is being held in Brooklyn awaiting trial on charges related to alleged sex trafficking and organized crime. He has pleaded not guilty to these charges and continues to deny any accusations made against him.
Here's ads banner inside a post
While awaiting trial, revelations from this former event planner have added complexity to the case and attracted significant public attention. The recent disclosures have sparked heated discussions and raised doubts about the extent to which these allegations may be true. Many believe that Diddy’s alleged actions could indicate a dark side of the entertainment industry, where powerful figures use their status to manipulate others and create environments full of temptation but fraught with risks.
Public Reaction and Ongoing Debate
Since these accusations surfaced, public reactions have been mixed. Some have condemned and criticized Diddy, believing that if these actions are true, they are unforgivable. Others, however, argue that this is part of an ongoing legal battle, and there is still no conclusive evidence. This incident not only stains Diddy’s public image but also raises questions about the responsibilities of powerful figures in the entertainment industry and the protection of vulnerable individuals in settings where luxury and control often come with hidden pressures.
Although the case is still under investigation and the allegations remain unverified, the public awaits further developments to understand the real nature of the lawsuit. If Diddy wishes to protect his reputation and public image, he will need to face justice and clarify the doubts raised by these accusations.
